Category Archives: Politics

The Black Panthers Party for Self-Defense

Huey P. Newton and Bobby Seale founded the Black Panther Party for Self Defense in 1966. Like many others, the Civil Rights Movement – more specifically the death of Martin Luther King Jr. – ignited them into action. While riots broke out in major United State cities, Newton and Seale poured over a document, the Platform and Program of what they want and what they believe, which served as the foundation of the Black Panther Party. Both men were active in Black Politics in college and both became involved with a group called RAM (Revolutionary Action Movement. The Black Panther Party became the largest Black Revolutionary organization to ever exist: they were the high point of the Civil Rights Movement with 5,000 full-time members who were either unemployed or were willing to give up their jobs.

Women, making up 70% of the party at one point, held vastly different roles than those of the men: who occupied all the leading positions. The Party confined women to secretarial, administrative, childcare, and other traditional roles, while men developed political ideas, spoke, and held leadership roles. Despite many attempts, the Party never achieved gender equality.

According to the Black Panthers, the exploitative capitalist system had deep roots of economic and political racism; therefore, in order to reach Black liberation a revolutionary movement to overthrow the entire power structure must occur. The Black Panthers recognized that a small class held all the economic and political power and that they used that power to exploit the majority. The devastating fiscal reality of Blacks; 32% living under the poverty line, 71% of the poor living in metropolitan areas, and 2/3 living in the ghetto – confirmed this theory.

While Seale branded the white man as the oppressor, he did distinguish between racist whites and non-racist whites and he brought that philosophy to the Panthers. He also claimed the Panthers differed from cultural nationalists because the Panthers – while believing in Black nationalism and Black culture – did not believe either of those things would lead to Black liberations, thus rendering them ineffective.

Instead, he advocated for taking up arms for self-defense against police brutality and giving back to their community in a number of ways including free breakfast for children, health clinics, and shoes for children. According to Seale, to fight racism with solidarity; to fight capitalism with basic socialism; to fight imperialism with proletarian internationalism should serve as the Party’s guiding philosophy.

The development of the Civil Rights Movement directly promoted the formation of the Black Panther Party. The movement, largely based in the south, centered itself around demands of desegregation: particularly of busses, schools, waiting rooms and lunch counters.

Considering the police, local white mobs, and the KKK, civil rights protestors constantly faced the threat of attack or of being killed. Despite this reality protestors stuck to their philosophy of civil disobedience and passive resistance, as MLK demanded. Though, while tensions and violence against the Civil Rights Movement increased the Black Panther Party picked up the ideology of Malcolm X, who called for a more revolutionary philosophy and a militant stand.

As violence against them surged, the Panthers leaned further into Malcolm X’s philosophy of self-defense by means of patrolling the police. With police brutality becoming more severe against Blacks, Huey learned the laws and could cite his right to observe a police officer carrying out his duty as long as a reasonable distance was maintained and could cite the court cases that defined what that distance was. The Panthers actions of self-defense inspired and empowered many. People found security in watching Black brothers and sisters protecting themselves and their interests.

In October 1966, the Black Panther party released their Platform and Program of what they want and what they believe. Many of their demands were simple: such as decent shelter fit for human beings, land, bread, education, clothing, justice and peace. They desired the power to determine the destiny of the Black Community and for power to return to the Black Community to organize, employ, and provide a high standard of living for its people. They wanted accurate education as the saw education as an opportunity to teach Blacks their true history and role in present day society. They felt that without that knowledge of themselves and their position in society and in the world they had no hope to identify with anything else.

Some of their more vital demands were to end police brutality and the murder of blacks by racist cops. They hoped to achieve this by organizing Black self-defense groups dedicated to defending the Black communities from racist policing, oppression and brutality. They also demanded to be tried before their peers – a person from a similar economic, social, religious, geographical and racial background – in court, rather than by just the white man.

With their Platform and Program of what they want and what they believe drafted and finalized, the Panthers felt ready to officialize themselves as an organization. On Jan 1, 1967, with the month’s paychecks of Seale, Newton and Bobby Hutton – their first member who police shot in the head and killed in the Spring of 1968 – rented out an old shop, and transformed it into an office, or their base for operations. Purposefully based in the community, working with the people, and for the people, the Party began to grow.

Relating to people’s needs served as a huge factor of the Black Panther Party. Seale reiterated the Party’s goal to change the existing system for a better system through revolutionary programs rather than just reform. Unfortunately, the success of the Black Panthers earned them the attention of the FBI and put them under fire from the American state. The FBI’s and J. Edgar Hoover’s COINTELPRO (Counter Intelligence Program) intensified against them: Party offices raided and burnt out food provisions. In addition, police, the KKK, and white mobs killed twenty-five Panther members in 1969 alone. Their work was disrupted, their finances drained, and their party was infiltrated – all done by the FBI.

Today the Black community is still hurting. The Black Panthers Platform and Program of what they wanted and what they believe has still been unable to come to full fruition.

No Pain, No Gain

Pain is weakness leaving the body. Feel the burn. No pain, no gain; right? Wrong. Especially when the “burn” requires the prolonged used of painkillers.

Serious allegations have revealed that while football players were pumping iron, the National Football League, NFL, was pumping them full of drugs.

All too often we learn of NFL athletes’ secret drug addictions that ultimately land them in legal trouble. Who would have guessed that the source and enabler of these addicts could be the NFL, itself?

In addition, countless studies have argued that professional football players have shorter life spans than your average American. Before, many assumed this was a result of the intense strain put on their bodies. The unveiling of these infuriating medical practices suggests that the treatment of the consequential injury could contribute as well.

The neglect was not accidental; it was a blatant disregard for the players’ health. The League’s actions clearly communicated the issue: they simply didn’t care. As in too many situations, the risk was worth the profit. As long as the players were winning games and generating revenue, they couldn’t be bothered. The players posed as investments, and the NFL squeezed every penny out of them that they could.

It appears that hiding legitimate medical concerns from the players is a nasty habit of the NFL; after a $765 million settlement after accusations of concealed concussion complications, retired players are coming out of the wood work once again to demand the NFL takes responsibility for the imminent danger the players were subjected to.

Team doctors and trainers brought disgrace upon the name of medicine; doctors had no concern for the medical state of their patients, they only cared about their ability to win.

Despite complete comprehension of the potential consequences resulting from the drug use, the NFL continued to issue pills like candy to insure further success on the field.

Now, if the players had knowledge of their injuries and elected to play through them that would be one thing. However, according to their allegations, the players did not know the extent of the damage done on their bodies – including broken necks and legs – and therefore did not have sufficient information to make an informed decision.

The League jeopardized the health of the players for the entertainment and loyalty of the fans. As a result, the players faced two undesirable choices: either take the drugs and play, or risk forfeiting their jobs. Just like that, a game they loved and centered their lives around became a threat to their health and well-being.

While players recognized their choice in taking the medication, they bring forth a compelling point: their doctors were trained professionals and they trusted them to have their best medical interests in mind.

Clearly, the NFL was aware of the illegality of their actions. Not only did they not obtain prescriptions or provide individual diagnoses, but also failed to keep records or educate players about what they were taking.

If its money the suit demands, the NFL will have no trouble footing the bill; however, if drastic changes do not occur soon, eventually they will be unable to keep up with the consequential lawsuits.

Fortunately, some of the demands by the retired players gear towards change and accountability. They want the League to fund a program to prevent addiction and help those with addictions that the NFL aided in initiating. In addition, they’ve asked for proactive prevention of problems, and help for those who are already experiencing the problems, that result from heavy use of painkillers.

Their requests are beyond reasonable they are necessary. Hopefully, the NFL will respond accordingly.


Brinson, Will. “Ex-players Sue NFL Alleging Illegal Painkiller Use.” CBSSports.com. CBS, 20 May 2014. Web. <http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/24567963/ex-players-sue-nfl-alleging-illegal-painkiller-use&gt;.

Chiari, Mike. “NFL Sued by Ex-Players for Painkiller Use.” Bleacher Report. Turner Broadcasting System Inc, 20 May 2014. Web. <http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2069944-nfl-sued-by-former-players-who-allege-illegal-use-of-painkillers-to-mask-injury&gt;.

“Ex-players: NFL Illegally Used Drugs.” ESPN. ESPN Internet Ventures, 20 May 2014. Web. <http://espn.go.com/espn/print?id=10958191&type=story&gt;.

Nuckols, Ben. “Ex-NFL Players: League Illegally Supplied Risky Painkillers To Mask Injuries.” The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 20 May 2014. Web. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/20/nfl-lawsuit-players-painkillers_n_5358842.html&gt;.

 

Open the Floodgates of Heaven

I can’t help but wonder: did the Catholic Church know exactly what they were getting themselves into before electing Pope Francis? Perhaps not; but, the people welcomed him with open arms and quickly adorned him with the title “The People’s Pope.”

Pope Francis represents change that many attest is desperately needed. The majority of his actions cater to a very basic principle: the Church should discriminate against no one.

To prove his desire to open church doors for everyone the Pope refuses to let controversial social and political issues keep people out. In addition, he pledges that any corrupting grasps on the church will be pried off. Religious propaganda to fulfill activists’ agendas will no longer be tolerated. Ultimately, the Pope wishes to “open the floodgates of heaven” and allow the love of God to flow through the streets unrestricted.

Rather than feigning ignorance, Pope Francis focused a spotlight on multiple current and pertinent social issues. He addressed the rights of LGBQ and asserted that measures to warrant property, financial, and health care rights are acceptable and worthy of tolerance. In his wake the possibility of marital rights for priest and permission for women to become priest are emerging for what I assume is the first time.

The most pressing issue that has been addressed is the infamous problem of sexual assault within the Church. The Pope was bold and unwavering in his statements; he asked for forgiveness on the guilty priests’ behalf and promised to enforce penalties on perpetrators.

While an overwhelming percentage of the Catholic Church view Pope Francis favorably, some are still skeptical. Particularly in regard to sexual abuse within the church, people worry that his proclamations are nothing more than a political move. Or, they fear that though he appears adamant now, with time the blazing trail he’s set out on will be snuffed out.

Interestingly enough, support for the Pope is not limited to a particular group within the church: young, old, frequent and occasional churchgoers, men, women – Pope Francis has pulled on the heartstrings of people around the world.

Though statistics show the number of Catholics and churchgoers hasn’t experienced notable growth, the devotion of current Catholics has. Many people claim the current progressions rekindled their faith and love for both God and the Church.

Is the Pope throwing the Church’s moral and social teaching to the curb? I don’t believe so. Rather, his revolutionary practices serve to direct the hearts and minds of Catholics to one of the most fundamental laws of Christianity: love thy neighbor.

 


Burke, Daniel, and Hada Messia. “Pope Francis Asks Forgiveness for Priests Who Sexually Abused Children.” CNN. Cable News Network, 01 Jan. 1970. Web. 27 Apr. 2014. <http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/11/world/europe/vatican-pope-sex-abuse/&gt;.

Clarke, Kevin. “The People’s Pope.” America Staging. The National Catholic Review, 2014. Web. 27 Apr. 2014. <http://americamagazine.org/issue/peoples-pope&gt;.
Wetzstein, Cheryl. “Liberals Take Heart from Pope Francis’ ‘home for All’ Remarks.” Washington Times. The Washington Times, 19 Sept. 2013. Web. 27 Apr. 2014. <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/19/liberals-take-heart-from-pope-francis-home-for-all/?page=all&gt;.

We the People

I don’t think I’ve ever been more blown away by a single statement. While scrolling down my newsfeed I came across an article about the Baggy Pants Ban that was just passed in NJ (and believe me I will get into that in a later post) and asked how that law was constitutional. Seconds later I got my answer, and I quote, “Wearing a belt has nothing to do w freedom of speech.” After an intense conversation that was going nowhere fast another person chimed in stating, “The first thing that you need to learn is that the constitution doesn’t always mean anything.”

Head in my hands, I felt sick to my stomach. Is this where we have fallen as a society? Is this really considered acceptable? To have no knowledge of the constitution; to submit to inexcusable corruption and encourage others to do so; to diminish a document produced by our finding fathers in an attempt to preserve the nation to a weathered scrap of paper. This infuriated me!

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

We the people. We are the people. If we don’t stand up for ourselves who will? We cannot just kneel down before the government and when our cries fall on deaf ears. We the people establish justice. We promote the general welfare. We insure domestic tranquility. What are we doing? Who are we waiting for?

I feel as if I need to make signs and run around cities encouraging people to open their eyes. I know mine have been shut for way too long.

Perhaps, before pointing fingers at the government, we need to point one at ourselves. Americans complain of government corruption. They gripe that the government doesn’t listen to them. But what are the people saying? Where are the people saying it?

As the years go on the inevitable storm grows stronger and darker. With the influx of social media more people are joining together to declare “no more!” But congress isn’t going to read your FaceBook page; the president isn’t going to follow you on Twitter. We the people have to do more.

Get angry; get loud; get informed. And get registered to vote for goodness sake!